+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 1.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro offers 2.0M more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
3 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:71.0%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:72.8%(+1.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:71.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:72.8%(+1.9%)
Providers:2