+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 22.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:85.0%(+22.0%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:63.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:85.0%(+22.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:63.0%
Providers:0