+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 4.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
5 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:90.0%(+4.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:85.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:90.0%(+4.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:85.7%
Providers:0