+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 1.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro offers 105.3K more tokens in context window than Llama 4 Maverick. Llama 4 Maverick is $11.73 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
11 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($11.73 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:75.5%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:76.6%(+1.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:75.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:76.6%(+1.1%)
Providers:7