+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 17.9M more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.5 Pro. Llama 4 Scout is $12.12 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
11 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($12.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:75.5%(+5.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:70.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:75.5%(+5.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:70.3%
Providers:6