+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Small 2506 leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Magistral Small 2506 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:59.1%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:68.2%(+9.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:59.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:68.2%(+9.1%)
Providers:0