+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 20.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
9 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:83.5%(+20.9%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:62.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:83.5%(+20.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:62.7%
Providers:0