+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 7.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
12 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:59.1%(+7.1%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:59.1%(+7.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%
Providers:0