Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 12.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro offers 2.0M more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $10.85 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer

Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita