+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 41.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:63.3%(+41.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:22.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:63.3%(+41.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:22.1%
Providers:0