+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 4.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 794.6K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.07 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:63.3%(+4.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:59.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:63.3%(+4.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:59.2%
Providers:2