+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 16.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
3 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:57.1%(+16.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:40.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:57.1%(+16.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:40.4%
Providers:0