+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 30.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 991.2K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $89.63 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($89.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:69.2%(+30.3%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:38.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:69.2%(+30.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:38.8%
Providers:2