+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 offers 23.6K more tokens in context window than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $9.63 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($9.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:59.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:70.5%(+10.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:59.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:70.5%(+10.8%)
Providers:1