+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4.1 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 mini leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini offers 23.6K more tokens in context window than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $1.63 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($1.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:59.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Average Score:68.8%(+9.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:59.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Avg Score:68.8%(+9.1%)
Providers:2