+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 9.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 912.4K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $12.13 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
6 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($12.13 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:56.0%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:65.5%(+9.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:56.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:65.5%(+9.5%)
Providers:2