+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 mini leads with 30.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 528.8K more tokens in context window than GPT-5 mini. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $1.88 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-5 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Mini was created as a more accessible version of GPT-5, designed to provide strong capabilities with improved efficiency and lower operational costs. Built to extend GPT-5's advancements to a broader range of applications, it balances advanced performance with practical deployment considerations.
6 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
GPT-5 mini
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($1.88 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Input:$0.25
Output:$2.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:51.5%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Average Score:82.3%(+30.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 mini
2024-05-30
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:51.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Avg Score:82.3%(+30.8%)
Providers:2