+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 1.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 920.8K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $11.63 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
5 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($11.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:69.5%(+1.1%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:68.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:69.5%(+1.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:68.4%
Providers:1