+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Grok-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 36.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 792.8K more tokens in context window than Grok-4. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $17.63 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($17.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:51.5%
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:87.5%(+36.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:51.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:87.5%(+36.0%)
Providers:2