Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 7.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
6 months newer

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together