+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 2.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:51.5%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:54.1%(+2.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:51.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:54.1%(+2.6%)
Providers:0