Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 28.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
4 months newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra