+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 10.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
4 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.38 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:68.8%(+10.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:58.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:68.8%(+10.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:58.3%
Providers:5