Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 4.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
2 months newer

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together