+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 15.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:51.5%
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:66.7%(+15.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:51.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:66.7%(+15.2%)
Providers:0