+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 6.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 18.9M more tokens in context window than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.01 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:69.5%(+6.7%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:62.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:69.5%(+6.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:62.8%
Providers:6