+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Small 2506 leads with 16.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Magistral Small 2506 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
4 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:51.5%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:68.2%(+16.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:51.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:68.2%(+16.7%)
Providers:0