+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 12.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH (86.8%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%), Global-MMLU-Lite (78.2%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.07 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:36.5%(+12.0%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:24.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:36.5%(+12.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:24.5%
Providers:2