Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 9.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 992.8K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
6 days newer

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
DeepInfra
Mistral AI