+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 9.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:59.9%(+9.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:50.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:59.9%(+9.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:50.3%
Providers:0