+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-mini leads with 8.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 863.2K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $14.63 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
4 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($14.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:51.5%
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:60.0%(+8.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:51.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:60.0%(+8.5%)
Providers:2