+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 23.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 756.8K more tokens in context window than o3. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $9.63 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($9.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:59.8%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:83.1%(+23.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o3
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:59.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:83.1%(+23.3%)
Providers:1