+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 10.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 756.8K more tokens in context window than o3-mini. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $5.13 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
6 days newer
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($5.13 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:53.3%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:63.4%(+10.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:53.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:63.4%(+10.0%)
Providers:2