+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs o4-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o4-mini leads with 21.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 756.8K more tokens in context window than o4-mini. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $5.13 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o4-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o4-mini was created as part of the next generation of OpenAI's reasoning models, designed to continue advancing the balance between analytical capability and operational efficiency. Built to bring cutting-edge reasoning techniques to applications requiring quick turnaround, it represents the evolution of compact reasoning-focused models.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
o4-mini
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($5.13 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:59.8%
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Average Score:81.5%(+21.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o4-mini
2024-05-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:59.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Avg Score:81.5%(+21.8%)
Providers:1