+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 22.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
5 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:70.0%(+22.8%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:47.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:70.0%(+22.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:47.2%
Providers:0