+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 25.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
5 months newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:68.0%(+25.0%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:43.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:68.0%(+25.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:43.0%
Providers:0