+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 12.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Multimodal was created to handle multiple input modalities including text, images, and potentially other formats. Built to extend Phi-4's efficiency into multimodal applications, it demonstrates that compact models can successfully integrate diverse information types.
4 days newer
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.22 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:68.0%(+12.9%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Average Score:55.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:68.0%(+12.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Avg Score:55.1%
Providers:1