+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 27.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 920.6K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
4 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.07 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:77.4%(+27.1%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:50.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:77.4%(+27.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:50.3%
Providers:1