+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 4.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral Large. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $7.63 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
2 months newer
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($7.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:68.0%(+4.0%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:64.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:68.0%(+4.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:64.0%
Providers:1