+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 6.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:70.0%(+6.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:63.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:70.0%(+6.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:63.1%
Providers:0