+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2 72B Instruct leads with 18.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH (86.8%), FACTS Grounding (83.6%), Global-MMLU-Lite (78.2%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.6% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.1%), CMMLU (90.1%), HellaSwag (87.6%). Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:28.4%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Average Score:46.3%(+18.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:28.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Avg Score:46.3%(+18.0%)
Providers:0