+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct leads with 10.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2-VL 72B was developed as a large vision-language model, designed to handle multimodal tasks combining visual and textual understanding. Built with 72 billion parameters for integrated vision and language processing, it enables applications requiring sophisticated analysis of images alongside text.
5 months newer
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-08-29
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:67.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Average Score:77.9%(+10.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
2023-06-30
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:67.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Avg Score:77.9%(+10.7%)
Providers:0