+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 2.7% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
23 days newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:69.5%(+2.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:66.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:69.5%(+2.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:66.8%
Providers:0