Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 18.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite offers 925.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is $1.28 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
7 months newer

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita