+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GPT-4 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 26.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
9 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%(+26.2%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:48.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%(+26.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:2