+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GPT-4.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 11.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.3%(+11.2%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:63.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.3%(+11.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:63.1%
Providers:1