+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 11.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
27 days newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.3%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:85.3%(+11.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:85.3%(+11.0%)
Providers:1