+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Grok-4 Heavy
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 14.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:88.4%(+14.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:88.4%(+14.2%)
Providers:0