+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Jamba 1.5 Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads with 37.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
5 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.2%(+37.3%)
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:36.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.2%(+37.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:36.9%
Providers:2