+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 59.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 3 benchmarks. Notable strengths include MMMU (75.4%), GPQA (74.2%), AIME 2024 (73.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 38 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), GSM8k (97.3%), CBNSL (95.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 39 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:5.7%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:65.0%(+59.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:5.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:65.0%(+59.3%)
Providers:1